MAKE HURRICANES GREAT AGAIN


Three Cat 5 Hurricanes in a month – or is it five weeks?
A couple of Cat 3’s in between.
Never happened before.
 
Climate Change is still a load of Codswallop according to the Koch Brothers and those whose intelligence have been bought by Koch money!
 
Trump is still wanting out of the Paris Climate accord unless there are terms favourable to the USA.
 
What does he want? The Paris Accord to keep its Hurricanes to itself?
 
Or a donation to the USA to cover the Trillion Dollars it will take to recover from this year’s hurricanes?
 
Let’s not think ahead to next year – – – –

Protected: Tales from the Roman Forum #113


This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Do you remember Typhoon Hato?


Do you remember Typhoon Hato?

Strange. It only happened four days ago.

It was reported on ABC Online News.

 

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-24/typhoon-hato-hits-southern-china/8838850

Just this once.

How about Tropical Storm Pakhar?

Of course not. It only happened yesterday. And multinational broadcaster SBS reported it once.

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/08/27/storm-pakhar-hits-hong-kong-and-macau

Pakhar effectively hit the same areas devastated by Hato.   Two really bad, destructive weather events within four days.

Here is the Video on Chinese TV at

And a still, for when the Vid is no longer available.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And you probably knew nothing about them.

Now have you heard about Harvey?

My point is made!

Pay Some Tax and Maybe We’ll Listen


Once again, the CHURCH is

interfering with democracy.

‘Just say ‘no’: Archbishop Denis Hart rallies
Catholics over ‘vital’ marriage poll’

 

 SHUT UP,

YOU IMPERTINENT MEDDLER!

Stop interfering in our politics.

If it ever comes to pass that you actually pay some tax on the millions you gouge from the weak and foolish, then you may have some right to comment on Australian concerns.

Until then stay out of Australian Politics.

How about you and the rest of your ‘Bishops’ take some care of those whose lives are entrusted to you. Like, you know, like not sexually abusing them!

Oh, that’s correct.

Image may contain: text

We are supposed to forget about all that sexual abuse you have facilitated. Forget that so many of your priests and bishops are predatory kiddie-fiddlers and rock spiders!

We are only allowed to listen to and think upon your lies de jour about same sex marriage.

All the while you prey like

predatory parasites on our nation.

Peter Dutton and Section 44 (v)


We have all been hearing about the seven dual citizens we have in  our Parliament. It is still seven, isn’t it? No new ones today?

They have fallen foul of a part of Section 44 of the Constitution. That is the section which states who is ineligible to stand for election in the first place.

Because it is being talked about so much, here is Section 44 in its entirety

.

Yes, this is the fine print. Now look closely at subsection (v) and think upon it for a minute.

OK, Now let us look at one particular Member of Parliament.  Several screen shots are next. They are from this tweet;

To see those images more clearly, here they are;

 

Next let us look at the Parliamentary Register of Members Interests which are fully available online at;

http://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Members/Register#cf

These are the relevant parts of Peter Craig Dutton’s Register.

.

So Dutton has done the correct thing and shown his involvement in the RHT group. He benefits financially from his wife’s child care business.

Now, does this put him in contravention of Section 44 (v)?

Apparently not because no one is querying his position. Not out loud and not in the MSM, anyway.

And reading this article from the SMH shows why, in a round about way.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/boom-time-for-corporate-childcare-in-australia-20161109-gslgx2.html

The Government gives money to parents as subsidies to Parents. These are not small sums, either; ‘costs to the taxpayer of a staggering $10 billion a year in parent subsidies’.

These subsidies are given to parents for the specific purpose of paying for child care at a Child Care Centre. The payments are not ‘untied’ money. The money is paid on condition it is passed to a Child Care Centre.

So, in one way, the legalistic Public Service way, the Child Care Centre, and its owners are not receiving money from the Government.

In another way, in the logical world of real people and real events and real reality, that money is Government money being paid to the Child Care Centres!

Now we come back to the question of Peter Craig Dutton’s eligibility to stand for election for the Division of Dickson under Section 44 (v).  Technically and probably legally it would seem that he is.  It would be interesting to see the outcome of  High Court challenge.

Morally and ethically, he is not.

But how long has it been since moral or ethics played a part in Dutton’s life?

 

 

Mitch Fifield; Thief in Politician’s Clothes


Documents explaining a $30 million taxpayer grant to pay TV network Fox Sports for coverage of women’s and “niche” sports will not be released, Communication Minister Mitch Fifield says.

Mr Fifield told ABC Radio Melbourne this morning the Federal Government’s decision to fund the sports broadcaster for the coverage followed usual practice.

So we, the taxpayers of Australia must accept that our Federal Budget, where billions of our taxpayer dollars are allocated and spent, are written up on the back of dinner napkins or from a half remembered phone calls. This is the superb fiscal management which the Liberal Party has told us they provide.

mitch fifield guiltyThe obvious conclusion from this ‘funding’ debacle is that Fifield has stolen $30 Million of Australian taxpayer’s money and handed it, through Fox Sports, to Rupert Murdoch.

Refusing to release any paperwork or other evidence reveals the truth of this allegation.

Let me make it obvious!

Mitch Fifield is a thief and has stolen taxpayer’s money!

And Mitch, if you happen to have this libellous allegation brought to your attention and decide to sue the author, please do not hesitate.

Your only defense is in the papers you claim do not exist!

But don’t let that stop you from calling in the lawyers.

Sue me, you smug, thieving bastard!

Image

Malcolm Roberts for Dummies