Australia Destroys Its Own Internet

Yesterday the Australian Government destroyed Australia’s Software industry. Both major parties.

I noticed many people on social media were a bit confused about how it was being destroyed and how it would affect them.

Here is an explainer. Note – your banking is involved as well as your privacy – people who are told to do the Government’s work are not allowed to tell their employer whose product they have to undermine. Oh, and Apple may well pull out of Australia. Pity your iPhone is now too small to use as a doorstop!

Here is another explainer – there is satire in the fact that the Australian Government is proceeding as though it is unhackable – – – –

If Encryption Laws Go Through, Australia May Lose Apple

Apple may pull out of the local market, the Aussie tech industry could be crippled and hackers could crack previously unbreakable codes under “outrageous” encryption legislation the government wants to ram through parliament.

The federal government has long been pushing for law enforcement agencies to have access to encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and Signal.

The government, with the support of Labor, want to force tech companies to alter their apps so that communications can be monitored.

A push to ram the laws through parliament on Thursday, the last sitting day of the year, failed as both sides failed to reach agreement — meaning the laws will be delayed until at least 2019.

The legislation can force tech workers to cooperate with government and law enforcement in installing backdoors to access encrypted data — but these people cannot disclose the request to anyone, under penalty of several years in jail.

Experts in the industry say this could see people either jailed for simply doing their jobs, or fired for essentially hacking their own company by installing vulnerabilities in programs.

“The Australian government want to recruit average IT workers as spies.”

“But the target isn’t a terror organisation or an international crime gang, it’s the company they work for,” Alfie John, a Melbourne security programmer, told 10 daily.

This could see tech companies simply refuse to work with Australian authorities. Experts have pointed to the 2015 San Bernardino terrorist attack, where Apple refused to comply with FBI requests to unlock the suspect’s iPhone, as an example of how international tech giants may respond to such legislation.

There are concerns that such companies could pull out of Australia entirely, rather than work under such a system. The legislation has been panned by sources as varied as the Law Council of Australia, and Atlassian CEO MIke Cannon-Brookes.

The legislation — known as the Assistance and Access bill — will likely be pushed through parliament on Thursday, the last sitting day of the year.

Tech experts have warned that the laws are drafted in such a way that people could be jailed for simply doing their jobs, Australian software will be blacklisted on global markets, and international tech giants may simply refuse to do business in Australia.

The government has specifically insisted the legislation does not allow for “backdoors” in software. Justin Warren, an IT consultant and Electronic Frontiers Australia board member disagrees. “That’s not how it works. If you break encryption in one place, it’s broken everywhere,” he said. “The backdoor will there. They say they can keep it safe, but they can’t.”

Dr Suelette Dreyfus, a cybersecurity and privacy researcher at the University of Melbourne, agreed.

“Communications can’t simultaneously ‘be secure’, and ‘be wiretap-able’,” she told 10 daily.

“There will be smart criminals who will find and use these backdoors in all sorts of dangerous ways.”

Warren pointed out how national security organisations around the world have had their tools stolen and used by criminals.

This could expose any platform that uses encryption technology, from online banking to mobile gaming or dating apps like Tinder.

“It is that serious. It is outrageous,” Warren said.  “The NSA had a lot of special tools stolen by criminal syndicates. If it gets out there, someone will buy it.”

Digital rights activist Asher Wolf had similar fears.  “[The vulnerabilities] will be captured by somebody, a foreign actor, and then we’ll see some of those tools being used out in the wild. That’s an atrocity for security and privacy, particularly around banking and online security,” she told 10 daily.

Elsewhere, there are fears the legislation could effectively cripple Australia’s local tech industry. Warren claimed overseas customers and investors would be “suspicious” of Australian products from now on, as they would be unsure whether it contains government-mandated backdoors.

“Our government refuses to use Huawei because of fears the Chinese government has put backdoors in their software. Australia will be the Huawei for the rest of the world,” Warren said.

“It could kill us.”

Wolf warned of a “brain drain”, as top tech minds may move overseas to work rather than have to operate under such a system.


READ MORE: No Backdoor But ‘Side Door’ For Encrypted Messaging In Government Crackdown

READ MORE: The Anti-Terrorism Encryption Laws We Can’t Afford To Get Wrong




Special Days


Robert Kennedy on Tony Abbott


The Dash


Sorry, It was an accident.

A Day Dream

The recent Victorian Election sent my mind off on a daydreaming journey.

We have seen the Liberals and their foolish coalition partners fail in elections before. They have always, so far, bounced back.

Yet what if these events, first in Queensland, then in W.A. and now in Victoria, coupled with the bare wins in Tasmania and South Australia, really do signify a watershed. A time when the political climate change of demographics has an effect in Australian politics.

The rural elector is beginning to trust the independent rural woman over the rural party man. The election of Karen Phelps could be a city-based outlier or it could be another harbinger. Every centre-right independent elected weakens the Liberal/National Coalition as we know it.

If these events are signposts for the future, what would the results be?

Could it be that the old paradigm of capital versus labour is about to change into a new vision of the Environmentalists versus the Workers with the discredited capitalists suddenly powerless as the people ignore their political posturing and remember their destruction of our climate and the world in which we live..

Will there come a time when the Greens and Labor are the major parties with clearly defined differences and clearly defined policies?

Perhaps the friction and hatred between the Greens and Labor we see at a grassroots level is simply from a premonition. A premonition that these are the two parties of the future.