The Free Market; Maggots and Tapeworms

We keep hearing about “The FREE MARKET” capitals included as though it is some sort of Holy Grail.

The Institute of Public Affairs keeps extolling its ancient and venerable beauty. Its ineffable desirability.

In my perverted mind I sometimes ask unwelcome questions and so, with some inevitability, I asked these questions.

Just when was the time in human history when the FREE MARKET ruled in its sublime wisdom and , secondly, should I support the FREE MARKET?

It led me to think seriously about humanity’s march from the Hunter Gatherer society to the modern Nation State. How has society changed and are there any lessons hidden in history?

In the dim distant past, our ancestors cooperated with each other. Had they not, then sabre toothed tigers would have sent us extinct before our ladies had a chance to learn about agriculture.

Then, without a need to hunt for food, we blokes muscled in on the agricultural scene and found a way to regulate it, to help it grow and to control it. Women could now be locked up inside the cave, for their own safety of course. This great new way of life also led to other human tribes invading and killing us which wasn’t the best thing for the cropping cycle.

Kings and Emperors and petty Princelings began to rule over us. Gods were invented and had to be fed, just as the other Rulers were. Of course there was a warrior caste whose job was not to farm but to protect the farms. They had to be fed as well. “Tax” was invented so the leaders, the soldiers and those who talked to God were able to do their thing without having to actually produce anything. The farmers were a bit of a problem but they bred freely so were always replaceable.

There was a lot of confusion about just how society should be ordered so a very wise King named Hammurabi wrote everything down in the world’s first set of Laws. Now everyone was happy so the status quo lasted for thousands of years.

OK. We are up to the Middle Ages

Still no sign of a “Free Market”

Then the peasants in France got upset and cut off the heads of everyone who had bullied them in the past. Suddenly there was the French Revolution and the American War of Independence. In an orgy of Democracy, and in a two hundred year blink of humanity’s eyelid, Rulers and their class lost their heads and were swept away.

In that tidal wave of Democracy, everyone was free. Well, almost everyone. Slaves were not really human so they could not be free and women were definitely inferior to humans so they didn’t get a say in anything. But everyone else was free!

Democracy is in a museum.
Is it extinct?

No! Of course the Orientals couldn’t be free. They weren’t proper humans either. If they were they would have invented Democracy.

So everything became free. And everyone had a vote. And of course the Market had to be free as well. Please don’t ask me why, it just had to be. Everyone still had to pay taxes. To themselves, of course since it was all democratic. Even your business had to pay taxes. That was something sacrosanct. It had been so since time immemorial when Pharaohs had to finance wars against Hittites.

Just as it had become a human tradition to attempt to reduce the amount of tax they owed to God, the King or to themselves. Even at the risk of losing their head or their liberty.

One problem with all this Democracy and Free Thinking was that the rate of invention went up and there were suddenly lots of new stuff around. Some of it was quite big new stuff and needed lots of cooperation to create. Sort of a throwback to the cooperation of the distant past when it was needed to create a dead mammoth. Lots of bloodthirsty savages temporarily working together.

So big ships, big telephone systems, big railways all got built by these cooperating savages. And everything got faster. And spread further. So the biggest of the bloodthirsty savages from all over the world finally got to cooperate with each other. But that is only a difference in scale. Not something new.

Perhaps there was something I missed. Something very early on I hadn’t seen.

Uh Oh.

I just spotted an example of the Law of Unintended Consequences. Hammurabi’s Laws needed someone to explain them. Throughout this Body of Law, some maggots began spreading. And they became known as “Lawyers”!

Through ages of interpreting, re-interpreting and, when all else failed, by rewriting the Law, Lawyers became the only ones who could understand it.

For much of civilised time, we ordinary mortals just shook our heads and got on with life. Male mortals, of course because women, slaves and Orientals could not hope to understand important stuff like that.

Lawyers noticed that Democracy had made everyone “free” and so some of them set their mind to determine the ramifications. If people were free, and we have a free market, then obviously the inhabitants of “The Market” had to be free as well. And so Lawyers determined that the Companies within the Free Market were as free as people. In fact that determination led to the conclusion that Companies are People as well.

Now, finally, we have found something new.

The Gods had been sort of people, incorporeal but existent, for millennia, yet they only lasted for a while before being replaced. Now we have Companies which are an incorporeal construct yet being treated as though they have a mind and a soul of their own. They must be people for they grow and grow and now cover the world.

Now is not the time to go into the 127 real, born of woman, human people who control those Companies.

Instead we should look at the consequences of these Companies being People. These Companies are the Free Market. The Free Market, according to the Institute of Public Affairs, I should be supporting. Supporting totally because I am free as well.

  • Just as people in a Democracy have a vote, the Free Market Members have a vo – -

NO THEY DON’T! But they can lobby and bribe and corrupt.

  • Just as people in any Governmental system pay taxes, the Free Market Members pay taxe – -

NO THEY DON’T! Well, yes they do, within the limits that they allow the Government to tax them.

  • Just as people in in any jurisdiction who break the law go to jail, the Free Market Members go to ja – -

NO THEY DON’T! They do not go to Jail, except for an occasional “human person” scapegoat. They become too big to fail. They are certainly never executed for all the deaths they cause.

If Lawyers are the maggots in our body politic, then these Free Market Members have become the parasitic tapeworms within that body!

And so, my answer to my question is a double “NO“.


No! There never was a time when the Free Market was the norm for Human Society”


No! I do not support the Free Market.”

My question to you, my discerning reader is, “Do you support the right of tapeworms to suck the life out of you?”

Adapted from a post previously published on the archive.

Poll Sum; 17th Sept





Polls older than 14 days have been discarded

This past fortnight saw 7758 people polled

Data as at Tuesday night, 16th September.

Based on the AEC numbers there were 14722754 enrolled electors for the 2013 election so a fair estimate for the 2016 election is 15,000,000 electors.

The symbolic red and blue bar is drawing a line where numbers swing around unpredictably.


Polls Included and Totals Polled.

One poll Essential 2/09 was deleted

One Poll, Essential 16/09 was added

Any polls which come out after midnight Sydney/Melbourne time will be included in next week’s charts.



Percentages converted back to Raw Numbers

Simple maths convert the published % to raw numbers using the electors polled.

Liberal and National Party numbers are combined.


Note:- Newspoll lumps PUP voters with “Others”. I split them out at as near to 50-50 as I can with whole numbers. That seems to be how the numbers for other polls fall.

Two Party Preferred


Translating this into electoral numbers,

assuming 15 million electors

we have a National Two Party Preferred of

L-NP 7,047,000 Votes

ALP 7,953,000 Votes

Which leads to – – -



A difference of 906,000 voters.

The swing to the Left continues.


The two biggest minor parties will have a major impact come election day.

Here is how they are going.






The Greens support continues to rise and is now within 0.05% of their highest share of the vote since Poll Sum has been operating (Mid May 14)


PUP has continued to fall and has now reached its lowest level since Poll Sum began. Perhaps Clive has been a little too obvious with his voting pattern.


The swing to the Left is continuing and could be a reflection of the country’s dislike of going back to an unwinnable war. With the terrorist silly season upon us, with increased delays at airports, hospitals being evacuated and rubbish bins being welded shut it is no wonder many voters are skeptical of the need for all this brouhaha. There is, however, a serious side to all this. If we continue to ignore the Government and refuse to be terrorised into pushing the polls “his” way, then we may well see a “false flag” terrorist event or two to pull us all into line. That will not be funny if it happens.




Over to you, the discerning reader.

Poll Sum; 10th Sept





Polls older than 14 days have been discarded

This past fortnight saw 7824 people polled

Data as at Tuesday night, 9th September.

Based on the AEC numbers there were 14722754 enrolled electors for the 2013 election so a fair estimate for the 2016 election is 15,000,000 electors.

The symbolic red and blue bar is drawing a line where numbers swing around unpredictably.


Polls Included and Totals Polled.

Four polls, Reachtel 21/08, Morgan 25/08, Newspoll 26/08 , Essential 26/08 were deleted

Three polls, Morgan 8/09, Newspoll 9/09, Essential 9/09 were added

Any polls which come out after midnight Sydney/Melbourne time will be included in next week’s charts.



Percentages converted back to Raw Numbers

Simple maths convert the published % to raw numbers using the electors polled.

Liberal and National Party numbers are combined.


Note:- Newspoll lumps PUP voters with “Others”. I split them out at as near to 50-50 as I can with whole numbers. That seems to be how the numbers for other polls fall.

Two Party Preferred


Translating this into electoral numbers,

assuming 15 million electors

we have a National Two Party Preferred of

L-NP 7,081,500 Votes

ALP 7,918,500 Votes

Which leads to – – -



A difference of 837,000 voters.

That almost smells like a swing back to the Left..


The two biggest minor parties will have a major impact come election day.

Here is how they are going.






The Greens rose back towards 10.5%. Is this the result of a growing revulsion at the Asylum Seeker policies of the two major parties? Or is that part of the PUP vote which is naturally opposed to the major parties now leaving PUP and going straight to the Greens?


PUP has begun to fall. Whether it is the “Lambie” factor or the sudden closeness to the L-NP as shown by the self-centred repeal of the Mining Tax I shall leave to those better versed than me to determine..


The swing to the Left seems to be holding. The big worry is the length of time still before we have the 2017 election.


The total number of people choosing to vote for a party other than the two majors (Greens, PUP & “others)  has reached 24%. That is 3.6 million voters! Could it be that we are seeing a long term movement away from the Majors as one of the minors continues to grow and eventually we will have a three-party system? It has been 70 odd years since the current political landscape was created. Such stability can look permanent yet it ignores the turbulence which went before. History does show that nothing in human society is truly permanent.



Over to you, the discerning reader.

The Christopher Pyne Reality

Christopher Pyne’s Childhood began when he was born in Adelaide on 13 August,  1967 and christened Christopher Maurice Pyne, the Member for  Sturt entered the House of Representatives aged just 26 in 1993.

Since then political wonks have attempted to find out just what makes him tick. Who is he and why is he that way? If we go back to his parents and his formative years we may find a few clues.

He was the youngest of five children in an affluent middle-class Catholic family. His father, Remington, was a distinguished ophthalmologist who was South Australia’s Father of the Year in 1976. Remington Pyne was born on 6 March 1929 and died on 8 April 1988 at the young age of 59. He took a special interest in dyslexia when Christopher’s oldest brother was diagnosed with reading problems and helped found SPELD, a non-profit group to help people with learning difficulties. In his childhood Christopher often visited the hospital with his father. The nuns who used to run the place wore floor-length robes that hid their feet, he says. As a kid, he was convinced they floated along the corridors. 

Pyne’s mother, Margaret, has always been a staunch Liberal supporter. Pyne said in an interview with Jane Cadzow, “It’s in my DNA to be a Liberal. I was wearing ‘Turn on the Lights’ Liberal badges to school during the election campaign in 1975, when I was in grade 3.” From the same article, we find that Pyne often sided with his mother in lively discussions around the dinner table. “Everybody had strong views,” he says. “We could argue about everything under the sun.” Possibly unkind was a description of Pyne I found in a comment on a blog post. “Christopher Pyne is the Oedipal son of the celebrated South Australian doctor Remington Pyne.

In a combination of his mother’s interest in Liberal politics and a need for his mother’s approval we perhaps find Pyne’s political motivation and a need for approval.

Was the first sign of this need for approval when “aged 12 when he fought his first election, in a mock ballot at Adelaide’s Saint Ignatius College. Young Pyne wanted to play the Liberal candidate. When the teacher chose “a less popular boy” to stand against the well-liked Labor candidate, Pyne “smelt a rat”. He started campaigning for the Liberal contender and won.

Five years later, at 17, he joined three organisations in a single day: the Liberal Party, the University of Adelaide’s Liberal Club and the Young Liberals.

Even now, according to Erik Jensen, “Pyne is always the first to clap after speeches. He is first to his feet for prayers. There is something of the child in his desire to do well.

Pyne himself has said, revealing, “I’ve almost always been exactly the same,” he says. “I can’t remember a time when I haven’t been the same.

Leaving the inner workings of the Peter Pan Member for Sturt for the moment, here is a history of his political life. Yet there seems to be a redundancy there. One could make a case for him having no life other than politics.

From Wikipedia we learn that Christopher was educated at Saint Ignatius’ College, Adelaide and the University of Adelaide, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Laws and was President of Adelaide University Liberal Club from 1987 to 1988.pyneblurb

PyneelectcardIn his first year at Uni he stood in a Student election.

In “On Dit” The Adelaide University Students’ Association newspaper of April 1985 we find that Christopher Pyne was a candidatefor the “Education/Services Standing Committee”

Surprisingly, considering later developments, he stood on a platform opposing Student fees!

I feel it my duty to stand for election and do everything possible to forestall the introduction of fees and indeed to end any movement by the Federal Government to introduce fees

(Hat tip to of “Junkee” for this lead.)

Amanda having a "WTF?" moment.

Amanda having a “WTF?” moment.

He was a research assistant to Senator Amanda Vanstone (it seems this was a bit of moonlighting while still a student) and later became President of the South Australian Young Liberals from 1988–1990.

He was just 20 when his father died in 1988. Almost immediately, he was running for parliament – so young the Liberal Party had him take his face off election posters. Selected as the Liberal candidate for the state seat of Ross Smith – a safe Labor seat – at the 1989 election, Pyne was defeated by the sitting member and Premier of South Australia, John Bannon.



He earned a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice at the University of South Australia and began practising as a solicitor in 1991. It is worth noting, in light of later developments that both his baccalaureate and his Diploma were gained under the Whitlam “No University Fees” system. So his University education was free.

At the 1993 Australian federal election, aged 25, Pyne was elected to the Division of Sturt in the House of Representatives. He had earlier defeated ex- Fraser Minister for Home Affairs and the Environment and for Aboriginal Affairs, the Anglican Ian Wilson, 35 years his senior, in a bitter and divisive pre-selection battle for the seat.

Sometime in that first term, around 1995, Christopher married Carolyn.

Pyne is a republican and established himself as a member of the moderate faction in the South Australian wing of the Liberal party, supporting then Deputy Leader Peter Costello. In 1994, after serving in the back benches for a period, Pyne was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Shadow Minister for Social Security. He retained this position after John Howard was elected as leader, and up to the 1996 election.

After the Coalition victory at the 1996 election, he remained in the backbench where he  chaired the Australia Israel Parliamentary group from 1996 to 2004.


Pyne Rising in Government

Christopher Pyne, 2003

Christopher Pyne, 2003

Wikipedia records that in 2003, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Family and Community Services, where he remained until 2004, when named Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Health and Ageing. As Parliamentary Secretary, he defended the government’s “War on drugs” and established his strong support of illicit drug prohibition, as opposed to harm minimisation.

He is an advocate for mental health, founding the youth mental health initiative, Headspace during his time as Parliamentary Secretary. He remained as Parliamentary Secretary until 30 January 2007 when he was appointed Assistant Minister for Health and Ageing. He held this portfolio until 21 March, when he was appointed Minister for Ageing, 

Pyne plotting in Opposition

Pyne came close to losing Sturt at the 2007 federal election to Labor candidate Mia Handshin, gaining just 50.9 percent of the two-party vote. Following the election in which the John Howard-led Coalition government was defeated by the Kevin Rudd-led Labor opposition, Pyne put himself forward as a candidate for Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party. In a ballot of Liberal parliamentary members, Julie Bishop prevailed with 44 votes, ahead of Andrew Robb, who won 25 votes, and Pyne 18 votes. Following the election of Brendan Nelson as party leader, Pyne was appointed Shadow Minister for Justice and Border Protection.

Following Malcolm Turnbull’s election as Liberal Party Leader in September 2008, Pyne was elevated to the position of Shadow Minister for Education, Apprenticeships and Training. After Deputy Leader Julie Bishop stepped down from the portfolio of Shadow Treasurer, Joe Hockey took up the portfolio, with Pyne replacing Hockey as Manager of Opposition Business. Pyne was reappointed as Shadow Minister for Education, Apprenticeships and Training and Manager of Opposition Business in the House of Representatives by Tony Abbott when he became Leader of the Opposition after deposing Malcolm Turnbull.


Jane Cadzow wrote, “During the term of the last (2007-2010) Parliament, the Speaker of the House, Harry Jenkins, ejected him from the chamber 14 times – more often than any other MP. After the federal election last August, Pyne was the first person in the new parliament to be thrown out”.

Following the 2010 election Pyne continued in his roles as Leader of the House and as Shadow Education Minister.

All was not placid in his own electorate in 2011 as reported on October 18th, pyne2011“TWO staffers of federal Liberal MPs have been expelled from Adelaide University’s Liberal Club. The staffers, who work for SA moderate Liberal MPs Christopher Pyne and Simon Birmingham, were accused of inappropriate recruitment practices, which has led to rejection of a number of membership applications.They have since set up their own breakaway group, Liberals on Campus, in opposition to the historic conservative-dominated Adelaide University club.Liberal Club president John Bowers claimed the pair and another colleague “appear engaged in a common purpose to improperly exercise influence over the affairs of the club

pyne tongueHis behaviour became ever more outrageous with his catcalling across the Chamber during Question Time which saw him ejected from the house on no less than 45 times during the 2010-2013 Government.

On one occasion, when sent from the Chamber by Speaker Anna Burke, he famously poked his tongue out at her as he passed her Chair.

Pyne ihas made himself very caricaturable

Pyne ihas made himself very caricaturable

He continually raised Points of Order and in excess of 100 attempts to raise Suspensions of Standing Orders.

His thin voice – part aristocrat, part magpie –  strains in its upper register in a continual reminder that he is different from the majority of people. His easily reddened face is a possible sign of some hidden disease.

Everything he does in public seems to attract derision from those on the opposite side of the political fence.

Unfortunately for Pyne he has placed himself between two fences, one separating him from those on the Left and the other from those on the extreme Right’

The Slipper/Ashby Affair

Two different reports of the same event from 17th May, 2012. James Ashby, Speaker Peter Slipper’s gay aide alleged sexual harassment by his boss. What emerged from this accusation was a murky background which may or may not have involved Christopher Pyne, returning MP Mal Brough and, peripherally, the youngest Member, Wyatt Roy. The truth has never been officially revealed although the orchestrated ‘No Comment’ which was a Pyne/Abbott tactic for some years leads to speculation.

The independent internet news site, The Australian Times reported,pynesidebar “Reports have surfaced that Christopher Pyne has emailed James Ashby, the former aide of Peter Slipper. Ashby has accused Slipper of sexually harassing him. Powerbroker Pyne initially said he did not contact the former aide and that he has no reasons to do so. He also publicly said that he did not email Ashby after March 19.  This, however, appears to be a lie as newspaper the Herald revealed an email sent by Pyne to Ashby on March 19. On the same night, Pyne and Ashby spent close to two hours of chatting and drinking in Slipper’s office. They were accompanied by another aide.  The time stamp showed Pyne emailed Ashby at 11.03pm.  It said, “You see, only aph,” which stands for Australian Parliament House.  Thirty minutes later, Ashby sent a reply, “Good having a beer tonight.”  The revelation is another blow to the Slipper controversy. Pyne has initially said that he could not remember asking Ashby for his number. He has also consistently refused to reveal the extent of his contact with the former aide. 

Meanwhile the News Ltd owned Adelaide Now reported, “THE Opposition says attempts to conjure up conspiracy theories around MP Christopher Pyne’s ‘porky’ relating to contact with a staffer of Speaker Peter Slipper are just distractions. Christopher Pyne had drinks in March with James Ashby, the staff member who has accused Mr Slipper of sexual harassment.  Mr Slipper has denied the allegations, which will be heard in the Federal Court tomorrow. Mr Pyne initially said his contact with Mr Ashby had been brief, but media reports said the manager of Opposition business had spent almost two hours drinking and chatting with Mr Ashby in the Speaker’s office. Mr Pyne then clarified he had met Mr Ashby three times – twice in the Speaker’s office and once when the staffer came by the Liberal MP’s office. Later he again clarified that he had sought Mr Ashby’s phone number but had never spoken with him on the phone.Now it has emerged Mr Pyne emailed Mr Ashby on the night they had drinks.

Pyne became famous for his repeated Points of Order during Question Time.

In April 2013, in an interview with Miranda Devine of the Telegraph he revealed that, “my intention, should I be fortunate enough to become education minister, will be to radically alter the way we think about education in Australia, to place competition, the individual and self-reliance at the centre of our education system,” he says. To do any good, Pyne will have to basically nuke the progressive education establishment.”

Back in Government

On 18 September 2013 he was sworn in as Minister for Education and Leader of the House in the Abbott Government.

Almost the first thing the newly appointed Minister for Education did was to scrap the so-called “Gonski” educational reforms.

Under his leadership, University fees have been increased, ignoring the selfish benefits of his own free University education. Almost anywhere you look on the Government benches there are Ministers of the Crown who received their own tertiary education free and are now working assiduously to remove that privilege from current and future generations of students.

Changing Parliamentary Language

In May 2014, Pyne managed to let out a word which can only be one of the forbidden words in a description of the Leader of Opposition Business, Tony Burke. Despite many efforts by a sympathetic media to obfusticate what was said, it was pretty obvious.

Enough said about that episode.

How Pyne Sees Pyne

 Christopher and Caroline Pyne with their children Eleanor, 12, Barnaby, 12, Felix, 10 and Aurelia, 5. Picture: Simon Cross Source: News Limited

Christopher and Caroline Pyne with their children Eleanor, 12, Barnaby, 12, Felix, 10 and Aurelia, 5. Picture: Simon Cross Source: News Limited

On his own website is the information that, “Christopher is married to Carolyn and is the father of Eleanor, Barnaby, Felix and Aurelia. To relax he enjoys reading Australian, US and European history, gardening, following AFL football and spending time with family and friends.

Eleanor’s Godmother is Christopher’s mentor and onetime boss, Amanda Van Stone.

Pyne’s four children are at school in Adelaide, from kindergarten to Year 8. His 13-year-old twins, Eleanor and Barnaby, are dyslexic , (like his eldest brother) and he says his life experience has “given me a particular insight into education”.

Pyne also appears to live in a Pollyanna-type world where everyone likes him. Erik Jensen reported him saying My wife sometimes says, ‘I don’t think that person likes

From "The Monthly"

From “The Monthly”

you.’ And I say, ‘How could they not like me? What are you talking about?’ And she says, ‘I think you’re missing the social signals.’ I’ve been in [parliament] for nearly 20 years … and if I took the comments that have been made about me personally, it would be hard, really, to keep doing this job.

His apparently incurable optimism also appears to have an effect on his memory. Speaking with Erik Jensen he said, “Touch wood, but I’ve never been defeated in an election,” he says with unbridled cheer. “I like the process of trying to get people to support you and I like winning.”

This despite the fact he DID lose his first election to John Bannon and he has lost two tilts at the Liberal Party deputy leadership.


How Others See Pyne

Those close to Pyne describe him as obsessed. Yet others say “there is absolutely no balance in his life at all” and, while he is married to wife Carolyn and has four children, his real marriage is to politics. . . . . Some of those mentioned, but not willing to go on the record, say Pyne is known among them as “the politician who developed the art of the double-double-cross”. . . . . (he said) “Politics is a battle of ideas, a passionate business, a zero-sum game and you inevitably pick up both friends and enemies.” . . . . . “He is an extraordinary individual,” one federal Liberal figure says. “He is just so driven it scares the living daylights out of people. He also is so well connected with the media, it scares people.”

In another article it is said that, “. . . no one disputes that Pyne still has a vindictive streak. “He is prepared to use all available tools to wreak revenge on those who attack him,” says Joe Hockey.In Gillard’s case, he focused on undermining her Building the Education Revolution scheme – a $16-billion construction program designed to create jobs and stimulate the economy while modernising Australian schools. It should have been a sure-fire vote winner but Pyne went after it with ferocious tenacity, so successfully publicising isolated cases of waste and mismanagement that by the time Gillard left the education portfolio to replace Rudd as Labor leader, the scheme was widely seen as an electoral liability.

Cadzow summarised a number of views, “Pyne is prissy, punctilious, irritating,” Sydney Morning Herald columnist Paul Sheehan has written. “Whenever he bobs to his feet or interjects, which is incessantly, I feel like lighting a mosquito coil.”Michael Egan, chancellor of Macquarie University in Sydney and a former Labor treasurer of NSW, is reported to have broken his mobile phone by throwing it at a television when Pyne’s face appeared on the screen. And it seems that plenty of others understand the impulse. When The Age ran an online poll last year asking readers how they felt about Pyne, two-thirds of the 22,672 respondents said, “Can’t stand him.” Even his Liberal colleagues have mixed feelings about Pyne. Beneath his chipper exterior, they say, he is the sort of political enforcer who will do almost anything to achieve his ends. “Ruthless” is the word that keeps coming up in conversations about him. 


Is Pyne Gay?

It is impossible to write of this complex person without looking at the continual innuendo about his sexuality. Jane Cadzow wrote “although he is married with four young children, Pyne has been dogged for years by rumours that he is gay. Needling remarks have been made in parliament: Hansard records that in February 2009, the then prime minister, Kevin Rudd, referred to him as “the member for skirt – that is, the member for Sturt”. Soon afterwards, NSW independent Tony Windsor used the same phrase, “member for skirt”.When Pyne was appointed manager of opposition business, Julia Gillard expressed surprise that the then Coalition leader, Malcolm Turnbull, hadn’t given the job to Tony Abbott instead. Faced with a choice between a dobermann and a poodle, she said, Turnbull had opted for the poodle: “In a choice between macho and mincing, I would have gone for macho myself.” The next day, when Abbott was having his make-up removed after a television appearance, he joked that “Christopher would probably want his left on”.When I ask Pyne about the innuendo, he is resolutely upbeat. “No, it doesn’t annoy me,” he says, suggesting that the cause of the confusion might be the way he talks. The Adelaide accent can be quite plummy – think former Liberal foreign affairs minister Alexander Downer – “and, you know, sometimes it’s misinterpreted”. At any rate, he says, “every person is different. And I’m quite comfortable with the person I am.” He dismisses Abbott’s make-up gag as unimportant: “That was just his towel-snapping humour in the locker room.” But a person close to Pyne says he was extremely hurt at the time, “not because of the insult but because the insult came from somebody he regarded as a friend. They were estranged for eight or nine months.” Abbott confirms that they fell out for a while: “It was an ill-chosen jest and, yes, there was a period when he was understandably out of sorts with me.”Pyne’s dealings with Gillard were never warm. Once, when they clashed in the chamber during her term as education minister, he made fun of the way she spoke. “At least I’m not the Kath Day-Knight of Australian politics,” he said. “Good on you, Kath. Look at moiye, look at moiye!” Since the poodle gibe, though, relations have been frosty. Pyne tells me that when the two were members of a parliamentary delegation to Israel in 2009, they exchanged four words in a week: ” ‘Hello, Christopher.’ ‘Hello, Julia.’ She didn’t even say goodbye!”Some say the nastiest gossip about Pyne emanates not from Labor but from right-wingers in his own party, who have targeted him because he is leader of the so-called “moderate” group (in favour of a republic, action on climate change and a compassionate stance on asylum seekers, for instance). “Those from the right of centre have done some pretty terrible things to him over time,” says former Liberal senator Amanda Vanstone, who is godmother to his elder daughter. “They have been relentless in working against him in what I regard as an unforgivable fashion.”One of his oldest friends, Adelaide corporate lawyer John Kain, is impressed by how well he has stood up to the scuttlebutt. “Many people would throw the towel in,” Kain says, “but I think the more of it that occurs, the stronger his resolve becomes. 

The still evolving Ashby affair also raises questions which will probably not be answered in our lifetimes.

A Short Anaylsis

After spending three weeks collecting and reading information for this post I can draw a few conclusions.

  1. His need for approval is still there and he rejects reality to substitute approval.
  2. He is vindictive and uses his wit to deliberately hurt others.
  3. He is willing to lie to hide unfortunate or inconvenient truths.
  4. He was quite correct when he said, “I’ve almost always been exactly the same.”
As additional material becomes available, it will be added.



There Is No “Them”, Only “Us”

Hamid KehazaeiLast night I was one of around 150 people who went to along to the #lightthedark candlelight vigil for Hamid Kehazaei. A snap social media event brought about by tragedy.

Wesley Church in Hay St Perth. James Lush of 720ABC acted as MC.

Those who shared were:

-Rev. John Jegasothy, Minister & Refugee

-Dr. Aesen Thambarin, Head of Refugee Health Network of Australia

-Sarah Ross, Refugee Rights Action Network WA

-Dr. Samina Yasmeen, University of Western Australia

-Jarrod McKenna, Love Makes A Way & First Home Project co-founder

I listened to these people who know the pain of being a refugee. Who have either lived it or seen it firsthand. Who put the loss of Hamid  into some perspective. Their words touched me, hurt me, shamed me.


And I cried.

I cried for the loss of a fellow human being.

I cried for the loss of the Australia of which I once was proud.

I cried for I am a part of a nation which has lost its humanity.

I cried for those forgotten in hidden concentration camps.

I cried because our murderers are shown more kindness than those who come to us for help.


Hamid Kehazaei fled his country for his life. My country killed him. Just as it killed Reza Barati.

Yet their deaths are only a part of the reason I cried.wesley2

Some of my tears were for the fear of the abyss. The abyss of uncaring cruelty. The abyss my country is blindly walking over. Led by both major political parties.

I have written before of Australia’s inbuilt racism. Of our distrust of our geographic neighbours. Our unfathomable fear of the “Other”.

We used to be better than this. We at least hid some of our racism, some of our fear of the outsider. Now we hide the objects of our fear. Out of sight and out of mind. Offshore.

Walking out of Wesley Church last night I felt some hope.

Because I was not alone. There were another 150 people with me who also felt the pain of a human life cut short for no reason except an irrational fear. Around Australia there had been similar gatherings, all trying to Light the Darkness which is falling onto the soul of our country.

And were willing to spend an evening honoring the life of a fellow human being.

For one short night, in one small place, there was no “Them”. There was just “Us”.

Hamid Kehazaei, you will be remembered.



Poll Sum; 3rd Sept







Polls older than 14 days have been discarded

This past fortnight saw 11,041 people polled

Data as at Tuesday night, 2nd September.

Based on the AEC numbers there were 14722754 enrolled electors for the 2013 election so a fair estimate for the 2016 election is 15,000,000 electors.

The symbolic red and blue bar drawing a line where numbers swing around unpredictably.


Polls Included and Totals Polled.

One poll, Essential 19/08 was deleted

One poll,  Essential 02/09 was added

Any polls which come out after midnight Sydney/Melbourne time will be included in next week’s charts.



Percentages converted back to Raw Numbers

Simple maths convert the published % to raw numbers using the electors polled.

Liberal and National Party numbers are combined.


Note:- Newspoll lumps PUP voters with “Others”. I split them out at as near to 50-50 as I can with whole numbers. That seems to be how the numbers for other polls fall.

Two Party Preferred


Translating this into electoral numbers,

assuming 15 million electors

we have a National Two Party Preferred of

L-NP 7,135,500 Votes

ALP 7,864,500 Votes

Which leads to – – -



A difference of 729,00 voters.

A minuscule change this week.


The two biggest minor parties will have a major impact come election day.

Here is how they are going.


The Greens rose back to an exact 10%.

PUP drifted back down.





This is the “Off” week with only an Essential Poll of just over 1800 responders giving a change of just .01% . So the seats lost and gained remain the same.  Next week will show the effect of a warmongering Prime Minister, a compliant Leader of the Opposition and a PUP which has gutted the working man’s superannuation.




Over to you, the discerning reader.

tony abbott’s Dream

While reading through an old ‘Australian Women’s Weekly’, as is my wont on a Monday, I found a letter from a member of the public .

This was from page 18 of the Sept 2nd, 1944 issue

Remember this is near the end of the 2nd World War which saw women working in munitions and aircraft factories, running farms and serving in an assortment of military corps.

tony abbott and Kevin Andrews (Minister for Families) would be totally at home in this society.



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,206 other followers

%d bloggers like this: